29 August 2009

It started with a Tweet from Miguel De Icaza. Miguel's the leader of the Mono project, whose goal's to bring .NET to Linux. He's also the former leader of the Gnome project. Generally, he's whip smart and not usually prone to flame baits. So, I tend to read his words carefully, as it usually pays off. He said: "I wish Java tried to compete with .NET, but they seemed to have given up a long time ago: http://tinyurl.com/mfxmqm"

At this point I wanted to write him a terse letter stating my point of view, stating how he had clearly missed the obvious. I resisted, cried a little, sat on the beach with candles, attended a book club meeting, found Jesus, and then came back and reconciled that I was just sad because he was right. He was also pointing out the obvious. (There, at least I can say that! in the anonymity of my blog, far, far away from where he might see it...)

The link points to integrations in Project Coin, a project that's taken the JDK and aggressivey evolved the language to try certain features out in an isolated fork. In general, I'm supportive of the movement, but it's a sad truth that any final edition of JDK 7 is already late, and will likely not incorporate many of those integrations in Project Coin, or even many of the originally announced - big ticket changes coming straight from Sun. JDK7 is the Windows Vista/Longhorn of the JDKs.

You remember Longhorn, right? It was the code name for Windows Vista for a few years. If I recall, there was talk of integrating 4 pillars or waves of technology into the then-hyped next generation of Windows, including WinFS (Am I wrong in thinking that it was called something else, then? Avalon? Or am I thinking of the now-defunct Java DI container?) Indigo, and a slew of others. As the roadmap slipped further and further, more things were dropped. In fairness, in 2009, some of those pillars have subsequently shipped, sort of, as parts of .NET 3.0-3.5x. Some are lost to the annals of history.

With a heavy heart I proceeded to code, ignoring what he said. I'm tougher than that. I can handle having the rug yanked out from under me. "Why would he say that about my precious Java??" I thought, typing as I thought it. "I wish I could come up with something to refute his claims!", I moaned. Something elegant, quick, crazy fast, and future proof. Something's got the best of C#, F#, Python, JavaScript and more. I tend to ignore skills I've built up over years of use and revert to primitive, conveniently blog-friendly samples from tutorials when I'm stressed (don't you?). And boy was I stressed! I looked at my screen. I was really in a tizzy at this point, thrashing away at the keyboard! (Like in those movies where they feature somebody running their hands along the home row and suddenly they've infiltrated the FBI's secret-most files.)

Here's what I had typed:

object Maps { 
 val colors = Map("red" -> 0xFF0000, 
 "turquoise" -> 0x00FFFF, 
 "black" -> 0x000000, 
 "orange" -> 0xFF8040, 
 "brown" -> 0x804000) 
 def main(args: Array[String]) { 
 for (name <- args) println( 
 colors.get(name) match { 
 case Some(code) => 
 name + " has code: " + code 
 case None => 
 "Unknown color: " + name 

It was a Christmas miracle! A language on the JVM that already had most of the proposed changes in Project Coin and great deal otherwise and was very fast and that worked on all platforms, just like Mono! Errr... that is, just like Java!

This language, Scala, has gained a great deal of traction in the Java community and even people you'd expect to offer otherwise have endorsed it. People like James Strachan, creator of Groovy, and James Gosling, creator of Java.

I just hope that other people can find out about this wonderful language. Why, wouldn't it be nice if -for Java 8 (will we ever get to have a Java X? How cool would that be??) - we just shipped Scala?

And that, boys and girls, is how Java outlived the cockroach, in our hearts.

The End!